12 Answers to 12 Conventional Lies
|
|
- Barak has turned every stone to achieve peace.
- At Camp David, Barak went further than any previous Prime Minister
- Arafat blew up the Camp David summit.
(4) -
All the time, we give, give, give. Arafat doesn’t give anything!
(5) -
How can one make peace with the Palestinians when they break every agreement?
- Barak is the heir to Rabin.
- The lynching in Ramallah shows that the Arabs are animals.
- The Palestinian media are instruments of incitement.
- They shoot at us and the Israeli army is exercising self-restraint.
System Message: INFO/1 (<string>, line 13)
Enumerated list start value not ordinal-1: "6" (ordinal 6)
(10) - The Arabs send their children against our army positions, so that they can be killed, In
order to provide pictures for the world media.
- Again it is proved that the whole world is against us. They are all anti-Semites.
- We have no partner for peace.
System Message: INFO/1 (<string>, line 24)
Enumerated list start value not ordinal-1: "11" (ordinal 11)
Barak has turned every stone to achieve peace.
Truth is, he has turned every stone to build settlements. Since his first day in office, he has
accelerated the pace of setting up new settlements (in the guise of “enlarging” existing
ones), confiscating lands, demolishing Palestinian homes and building “by-pass roads”
(whose main purpose is to add Palestinian lands to the “settlement blocs” which he wants to
annex to Israel.) In all these activities, Barak has done more than Netanyahu.
In the political field, too, Barak has upstaged Netanyahu: Bibi returned at least the greater
part of the town Hebron to the Palestinians. Barak has not returned one single inch of occupied
territory.
At Camp David, Barak went further than any previous Prime Minister
Even if this were true, it would mean very little. If one Marathon runner (Netanyahu) falls
down after one mile, and another (Barak) falls down after three, the difference between them
is not really important. What is important is that neither of them got even near the finishing
line (26 miles).
Barak’s proposals at Camp David were far from the minimum necessary to make peace with the
Palestinian people and the whole Arab world: Palestinian sovereignty over East Jerusalem,
and especially the compound of the holy mosques (Haram al-Sharif).
Barak indicated at Camp David that he might “consider” some cosmetic changes (and thereby he
indeed broke some of the Israeli taboos concerning Jerusalem) – but as a matter of fact he
denied the Palestinians, the Arabs and the Muslims sovereignty over the compound of the holy
mosques and the major Arab neighborhoods in the city. That’s why the summit failed and the
escalation started, leading up to the “al-Aksa intifada”.
Arafat blew up the Camp David summit.
On the eve of his departure for the summit, Barak announced five “Red Lines”, which he would not
cross under any circumstances. Among them: Israeli sovereignty over the entire city of
Jerusalem, No return to the 1967 border, Keeping 80% of the settlers were they are, No return of
a single refugee to Israel!!! Afterwards he softened some of these stands, but not enough to
come anywhere near an agreement.
All the time, we give, give, give. Arafat doesn’t give anything!
When the Palestinians agreed to a peace settlement based on the pre-1967 border (the Green
Line), they were already giving up in advance 78% of the land between the sea and the Jordan
river. They are ready to set up their state in the remaining 22%. Our government wants a
“compromise” over this area. Meaning: “What’s mine is mine, about what’s yours, we shall
compromise”.
(Factual background: the November 29, 1947, UN partition resolution gave the Jewish state
55% and the Arab state 45% of Palestine. In the ensuing war [started by the Arabs], we conquered
half of the territory allotted to the Arab state. Thus the “Green Line” came about, leaving 78%
of the country in our hands.)
The problem is not expressed in percentage points only. Barak appears to be asking for only 10%
of the occupied territories. In reality, it’s closer to 30%, taking into account the
territories he wants to annex in the Jerusalem area and place under his “security control” in
the Jordan valley. But even worse, in the map submitted to the Palestinians, these percentage
points cut the country up from East to West and from North to South, so that the Palestinian
state will consist of a group of islands, each surrounded by Israeli settlers and soldiers.
How can one make peace with the Palestinians when they break every agreement?
Well, Palestinian violations pale in comparison with ours. Before the end of the 5-years
interim period (May 1998), the IDF had to withdraw from all the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
except “specified military locations”, settlements and Jerusalem. Barak refuses to do this
even at this late date. Also, four “safe passages” between the West Bank and Gaza should have
been in operation long ago. In practice, only one was opened, and this one can only be used by
Palestinians after much harassment.
Barak is the heir to Rabin.
Far from it. Within a few months he has succeeded in destroying not only all the achievements of
Rabin, but those of Begin, too. He has buried the Oslo agreement (to which he objected from the
beginning) and destroyed the relations built up with much effort between Israel and a number
of Arab countries. He has created ferment among the Arab citizens in Israel itself. In many
respects, he has thrown us back to 1948, even 1936.
The lynching in Ramallah shows that the Arabs are animals .
In a confrontation like this one, each side points to the atrocities committed by the other,
“forgetting” the atrocities committed by his own side. Israel points to the horrible
lynching, the Palestinians point to the killing of 12-years old Muhammad al-Dira in the arms
of his father and the brain-killing bullets used by Israel army snipers against
stone-throwing children. Our acts of violence come in response to the actions of the
Palestinians, theirs come in response to ours. It’s a vicious circle.
The Palestinian media are instruments of incitement.
That is true, but unfortunately there is no great difference between theirs and ours in this
respect. Ours and theirs speak the same language, following guidelines from above. When
Palestinian TV shows over and over again the picture of the boy dying in the arms of his father,
that’s incitement. When our TV shows dozens of times a day, day after day, the atrocious
lynching in Ramallah, that’s incitement.
They shoot at us and the Israeli army is exercising self-restraint.
It is strange that in two weeks of “self-restraint”’ about 110 Palestinian and 3 Israeli
soldiers have been killed. No Israeli officer has explained (or was asked to explain) this
curious ratio.
(The explanation is, of course, that the Israeli army has long in advance trained snipers to
choose a person from among the demonstrators, take exact aim through a telescopic sight and
hit him with a special deadly, high-velocity bullet. Instead of “pacifying” the area, as
intended, this method has inflamed it even more. Every funeral has led to another
confrontation.)
The Arabs send their children against our army positions, so that they can be killed, in order
to provide pictures for the world media.
This is a horrendous accusation, betraying an obnoxious racism. It contains the belief that
Arab parents do not care about their children dying.
In the struggle waged by our underground organizations before 1948 and during our War of
Independence, boys and girls played an important part. The arms training of Palestinian boys
is no different from the training of our own Gadna youth battalions. The boy who, in 1948,
destroyed a Syrian tank at kibbutz Deganya has become a national hero. When a people fights for
its very existence and freedom, its youth cannot but take part. (I joined the Irgun, defined by
the British as a terrorist organization, at the age of 14 and a half. By the age of 15 I carried
guns.)
It is an illusion to think that Palestinian parents can restrain their children from going out
into the street and throwing stones, when they live under a cruel occupation and their
brothers and sisters provide examples of heroism and self-sacrifice. It is natural for the
Palestinian people to be proud of them.
Joan of Arc, by the way, was 16 years old when she led the French army into battle.
The settlers routinely exploit their children and babies, not hesitating to put them in
harm’s way.
Again it is proved that the whole world is against us. They are all anti-Semites.
World public opinion is always on the side of the underdog. In this fight, we are Goliath and
they are David.
In the eyes of the world, the Palestinians are fighting a war of liberation against a foreign
occupation. We are in their territory, not they in ours. We settle on their land, not they on
ours. We are the occupiers, they are the victims. This is the objective situation, and no
minister of propaganda (like Mr. Nachman Shai) can change that.
We have no partner for peace.
True, we have no partner for a peace that Palestinians see as a capitulation to Israeli
ultimatums. We do have a partner for a peace based on equality and mutual respect.
The solution is quite clear: the State of Palestine must be set up within the pre-1967 border,
with Jerusalem serving as the capital of the two states - East Jerusalem with the Haram
al-Sharif must belong to Palestine, West Jerusalem with the Western Wall and the Jewish
quarter must belong to Israel..
When this solution is accepted in principle, negotiations can start about the other
problems: mutual security, exchange of territories, a moral and practical solution for the
refugee problem, water allocation etc.
This peace will come about, because the only alternative is hell for both sides.
|